Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorÇamoğlu, Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorDemirel, Kürşad
dc.contributor.authorKahrıman, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorAkçal, Arda
dc.contributor.authorNar, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-21T05:59:06Z
dc.date.available2024-02-21T05:59:06Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationÇamoğlu, G., Demirel, K., Kahriman, F., Akcal, A., & Nar, H. (2024) Plant-based monitoring techniques to detect yield and physiological responses in water-stressed pepper. Agricultural Water Management, 291. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108628en_US
dc.identifier.issn0378-3774 / 1873-2283
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108628
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/5698
dc.description.abstractToday, the use of sensors and imaging techniques, which are used to obtain information about plants and soil in smart irrigation systems, is rapidly becoming widespread. This study aimed to investigate the usability of leaf turgor pressure and thermal images from plant-based monitoring techniques to detect water stress and the irrigation time of pepper (Capsicum annuum L. cv. “California Wonder”) and to determine their relationship with physiological traits in Canakkale/Türkiye in 2017 and 2018. The four irrigation treatments (100%, 75%, 50%, and 25%) were applied in the experiment. Leaf turgor pressure (Pp), thermal images and physiological measurements were carried out during the growing season. Soil moisture and Pp were monitored in real time by remote. Thermal and physiological measurements were made before each irrigation. As a result of the study, the average evapotranspiration (ETc) was 697 mm, and the yield value was 83.7 t ha−1 under non-stress conditions. Depending on the decrease in ETc, yield values also decreased significantly. Leaf water potential and stomatal conductivity values were statistically different in all irrigation treatments. The change in the activity of catalase (CAT) due to water stress was greater than that of superoxide dismutase (SOD). In this case, it can be said that other physiological traits are more successful than SOD in distinguishing water stress. According to the regression models, significant relationships were determined between both the indices calculated from the thermal images and Pp, yield, and physiological traits. The predictive ability of Pp values has been strengthened with the addition of meteorological properties to the model in general. The highest correlation (R2 =0.63) was between Pp + meteorological properties and CAT. All the regression models between physiological traits and indices calculated from thermal images were statistically significant. The highest R2 values were obtained in August. In this month, the highest correlations were between Crop Water Stress Index (CWSIp) and leaf water potential / stomatal conductivity (R2 =0.91), IGp and stomatal conductivity (R2 =0.80). The predictive power of CWSIp was higher than Stomatal Conductivity Index (IGp). The experiment illustrated that Pp and temperature data, which are plant-based monitoring methods, have the potential to detect water stress in peppers.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectPepperen_US
dc.subjectThermal indexen_US
dc.subjectTurgor pressure probeen_US
dc.subjectWater stressen_US
dc.titlePlant-based monitoring techniques to detect yield and physiological responses in water-stressed pepperen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6585-4221en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-2029-5884en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-6944-0512en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-0426-0745en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-5354-6379en_US
dc.relation.ispartofAgricultural Water Managementen_US
dc.departmentEnstitüler, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mimarlık ve Tasarım Fakültesi, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümüen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Ziraat Fakültesi, Bahçe Bitkileri Bölümüen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Bölümüen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume291en_US
dc.institutionauthorÇamoğlu, Gökhan
dc.institutionauthorDemirel, Kürşad
dc.institutionauthorKahrıman, Fatih
dc.institutionauthorAkçal, Arda
dc.institutionauthorNar, Hakan
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108628en_US
dc.relation.tubitakinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/TUBITAK/SOBAG/116O264
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorwosid-en_US
dc.authorwosid-en_US
dc.authorwosidAAG-4313-2019en_US
dc.authorwosidABG-7227-2021en_US
dc.authorscopusid51664600500en_US
dc.authorscopusid8597658300en_US
dc.authorscopusid22950699300en_US
dc.authorscopusid25824727600en_US
dc.authorscopusid57226082879en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001138925100001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85179182715en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess