Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTaneja, Sonam
dc.contributor.authorKaraca, Öznur
dc.contributor.authorHaritash, Anil Kumar
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-30T05:56:30Z
dc.date.available2023-10-30T05:56:30Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationTaneja, S., Karaca, O., & Haritash, A. K. (2023). Treatment of Pb-contaminated soil by electrokinetics: Enhancements by varying voltage, chelant, and electrode material. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 250, 107240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2023.107240en_US
dc.identifier.issn0375-6742 / 1879-1689
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2023.107240
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/4569
dc.description.abstractThis work examines the removal of lead (Pb) from artificially contaminated soils (1000 mg/kg Pb) using the Electrokinetic Remediation (EKR) technique. Operating parameters, including periodic voltage gradient, electrolyte amendments with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and a non-ionic surfactant (Tween 80), and type of electrode material were investigated. Results indicated that a high voltage gradient (2.5 V/cm), in conjunction with EDTA as electrolyte, and stainless-steel electrodes favored the overall removal process. Pb removal by selected electrolytes was in order EDTA (65 %) > Distilled water (64.1 %) > Tween 80 (6.2 %). Visual Minteq v.3.1 software was employed to predict the chemical equilibrium of different chemical species of Pb against pH. Results confirmed that when EDTA was used as an electrolyte, the [Pb-EDTA]2− complex predominated over the Pb(OH)2 complex at an alkaline pH, resulting in more removal. Findings suggested that stainless steel was a better alternative to graphite with respect to removal efficiency and corrosion effect at the anode. Considering the maximum Pb removal with EDTA at higher voltage, the energy consumption was also maximum (78.3KWh/m3). Nevertheless, the economic evaluation suggested that the cost per gram removal of Pb was lowest in this experiment (8 US$/g Pb) and, thus, can be considered for practical applications to treat the Pb-contaminated soils.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectContaminated soilen_US
dc.subjectEDTAen_US
dc.subjectElectrokinetic remediationen_US
dc.subjectLeaden_US
dc.subjectSurfactanten_US
dc.titleTreatment of Pb-contaminated soil by electrokinetics: Enhancements by varying voltage, chelant, and electrode materialen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-8191-1599en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Geochemical Explorationen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume250en_US
dc.institutionauthorKaraca, Öznur
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gexplo.2023.107240en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorwosid-en_US
dc.authorscopusid12797710500en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001001011100001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85158878691en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record