Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorErdem, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorSavaş, Türker
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-12T12:39:35Z
dc.date.available2023-06-12T12:39:35Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationErdem, H., & Savaş, T. (2021). Genotype-environment interaction in layer chickens in the growing stage: Comparison of three genotypes at two different feeding levels with or without red mite (dermanyssus gallinae) infestation. Archives Animal Breeding, 64(2), 447-455. doi:10.5194/aab-64-447-2021en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-9438 / 2363-9822
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5194/aab-64-447-2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/4297
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated how early growth was affected in various chicken genotypes, which were fed ad libitum or restricted and with or without poultry red mite (PRM) infestation. Atak-S (AS), New Hampshire Red (NHR), and Light Sussex (LS) genotypes were used in the study. In total, 120 chicks were used from each genotype. Four groups were formed: feed-restricted (FR) and infested with parasite (P+), FR only, fed ad libitum and P+ , and fed ad libitum only. Feed restriction was applied as 20ĝ€¯% of the feed consumption of the group fed ad libitum the day before for each genotype. The study was conducted between 2 to 12 weeks of age. Weekly live weights and feed consumption were recorded, and the feed conversion ratio was calculated. Traps were placed in cages to count parasites. Regarding the live weight, NHR tolerated the PRM infestation in the ad libitum feed conditions better than other genotypes. While the infested NHR and AS birds had lower live weights than the non-infested ones under FR conditions, there was no difference between infested and non-infested birds of NHR and AS genotypes when they fed ad libitum. The feed consumption of infested AS and NHR birds was higher than that of non-infested counterparts when fed ad libitum. By contrast, the LS chicks consumed less food in the infested environment. In conclusion, the genotypes responded differently to PRM infestation in different feeding environments.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCopernicus GmbHen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectBroiler-chickensen_US
dc.subjectCarcass characteristicsen_US
dc.subjectGrowthen_US
dc.subjectRestrictionen_US
dc.subjectProteinen_US
dc.subjectRealimentationen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectNutritionen_US
dc.subjectRegimensen_US
dc.subjectBehavioren_US
dc.titleGenotype-environment interaction in layer chickens in the growing stage: comparison of three genotypes at two different feeding levels with or without red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) infestationen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-8757-4685en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-3558-2296en_US
dc.relation.ispartofArchives Animal Breedingen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Ziraat Fakültesi, Zootekni Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume64en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage447en_US
dc.identifier.endpage455en_US
dc.institutionauthorErdem, Hakan
dc.institutionauthorSavaş, Türker
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/aab-64-447-2021en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorwosid-en_US
dc.authorwosid-en_US
dc.authorscopusid57217003830en_US
dc.authorscopusid55928372300en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000709226100001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85117376975en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMID: 34712775en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess