Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorÇiçek, Adem
dc.contributor.authorEkici, Ergün
dc.contributor.authorKıvak, Turgay
dc.contributor.authorKara, Fuat
dc.contributor.authorUçak, Necati
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-17T11:30:17Z
dc.date.available2022-08-17T11:30:17Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationÇiçek, A., Ekici, E., Kıvak, T., Kara, F., & Uçak, N. (2021). Performance of Multilayer Coated and Cryo-treated Uncoated Tools in Machining of AISI H13 Tool Steel—Part 2: HSS End Mills. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 30(5), 3446–3457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05657-9en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-9495 / 1544-1024
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05657-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/3673
dc.description.abstractThis part of the study aimed to investigate the effects of cryogenic treatment applied to uncoated high speed steel (HSS) end mills on cutting forces (Fc), surface roughness (Ra), and tool life. The milling tests were performed at four cutting speeds (40, 50, 60, and 70 m/min), three feeds (0.018, 0.024, and 0.03 mm/rev), and a depth of cut (2 mm) under dry and wet conditions. Three categories of uncoated HSS end mills were used in the tests: conventional heat treated (CHT), cryo-treated (CT), cryo-treated and tempered uncoated (CTT), and TiAlN/TiN multilayer coated (MLC) end mills. The test results showed that the lowest values of Fc and Ra were measured with the use of MLC end mills. However, the cryogenic treatment provided in a reduction in Fc and Ra values. In addition, under wet conditions, the CTT end mills exhibited better performance than the CHT ones by 71.4%. The test results showed while cryogenic treatment is a useful and cheap application in steels, it does not have the ability to compete with coating technology in terms of tool life in milling of hot work tool steel. This paper is organized into two sections. In the first section, cutting performance of cryo-treated and multilayer coated end mills is evaluated. In the second section, performance comparison of cryo-treated WC-Co (Part 1), HSS (Part 2), and MLC end mills in milling of AISI H13 hot work tool steel is presented.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCryogenic Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectCutting Forceen_US
dc.subjectHSS End Millsen_US
dc.subjectSurface Roughnessen_US
dc.subjectTool Lifeen_US
dc.titlePerformance of Multilayer Coated and Cryo-treated Uncoated Tools in Machining of AISI H13 Tool Steel—Part 2: HSS End Millsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-5217-872Xen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Materials Engineering and Performanceen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage3446en_US
dc.identifier.endpage3457en_US
dc.institutionauthorEkici, Ergün
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11665-021-05657-9en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorwosidCNK-8861-2022en_US
dc.authorscopusid36482674300en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000632341800005en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85103206693en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record