Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Emin
dc.contributor.authorKeskin Uslu, Eda
dc.contributor.authorÖz, Ceren
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-26T12:44:23Z
dc.date.available2022-04-26T12:44:23Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationYilmaz, E., Keskin Uslu, E., & Öz, C. (2021). Oleogels of Some Plant Waxes: Characterization and Comparison with Sunflower Wax Oleogel. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 98(6), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.1002/aocs.12490 ‌en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-021X / 1558-9331
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/aocs.12490
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/3557
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to develop the oleogels of teawax (TWO), rapeseed wax (RWO), orange peel wax(OWO), rose wax (RsWO), and beery wax (BWO), and tocompare their properties with sunflower wax oleogel(SWO). Since the literature lacks most of these newoleogels, the gained information would be valuable. Thewax oleogels were analyzed for their main physicochemi-cal, thermal, structural, rheological, and sensory properties.The minimum gelation concentrations (C*) ranged from1.0% (SWO) to 25% (RWO), with gelation times of0.3–205 min, respectively. While polarized light micros-copy images showed large crystal aggregates, X-ray dif-fraction patterns proved the presence ofβ ́ polymorphcrystals and some amorphous solids. Rheological analysesindicated that the samples had a weak-gel structure, andwere stable until around 30–70 C temperatures. Further,the oleogel samples showed a thixotropic rheologicalbehavior with force-related recovery at 10 C. Quantitativesensory descriptive analysis (QDA) proved that there weresome differences among the samples for sensory hardness,spreadability, liquefaction, rancid, waxy, and cooling attri-butes. Also, tea aroma in TWO, bitterness in OWO, androse aroma in RsWO were quite dominant. In conclusion,RWO and OWO seemed unsuitable for food applicationsdue to very high C* and bitterness, while RsWO and BWOcould be used in food formulations.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTea Waxen_US
dc.subjectRapeseed Waxen_US
dc.subjectOrange Peel Waxen_US
dc.subjectOleogelen_US
dc.subjectCharacterizationen_US
dc.subjectSensoryen_US
dc.titleOleogels of Some Plant Waxes: Characterization and Comparison with Sunflower Wax Oleogelen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-1527-5042en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-5876-3826en_US
dc.authorid---en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Oil Chemists' Societyen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Gıda Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume98en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage643en_US
dc.identifier.endpage655en_US
dc.institutionauthorYılmaz, Emin
dc.institutionauthorKeskin Uslu, Eda
dc.institutionauthorÖz, Ceren
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/aocs.12490en_US
dc.relation.tubitakinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/TUBITAK/SOBAG/217O094
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorwosid---en_US
dc.authorwosid---en_US
dc.authorwosid---en_US
dc.authorscopusid7103132473en_US
dc.authorscopusid57221384375en_US
dc.authorscopusid57224666096en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000644817500001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85108130525en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record